Train a pair of eye-catching eyes to identify the circle chair

I attended a meeting a few days ago and came across a three-piece set of Nanmu circle chairs in the conference room. What caught my attention was how unique and different they looked compared to the traditional rosewood furniture I've seen before, like red rosewood, sandalwood, or Burmese rosewood. These materials are well-known and widely recognized as premium options in the world of antique furniture. However, Nanmu is much rarer and less familiar to most people. Several colleagues gathered around the chairs, discussing their value. One person guessed 4,000 yuan, while another thought it might be worth 8,000. Just as we were debating, our CEO walked by. He's an expert in wood appreciation and has deep knowledge about the craftsmanship and aesthetics of circle chairs. With a smile, he said that the chairs weren't worth even half the price we mentioned. In fact, he claimed they could be bought for just a few hundred dollars. This statement shocked us all. After all, the chairs looked elegant, with a beautiful backrest pattern that was visually striking. But the CEO kept shaking his head, saying the craftsmanship was subpar and clearly not up to standard. We were curious—what made these chairs so different from the real ones? To find out, we took some time after work to go back to the conference room, take photos of the set, and closely examine every detail. **Related reading:** The old chair of the wooden chair Looking at the overall shape, the circle chair has a long history, dating back to the Ming and Qing dynasties. Classic designs from those periods are known for their balanced proportions, stability, and smooth lines. However, this set didn’t match that standard. From any angle, the chair seemed cramped, and when viewed from a distance, it looked awkward and unbalanced. There was no sense of harmony or elegance in its design. The coffee table also had issues. Its shape was clumsy, especially the legs, which looked too thick and unrefined. Our CEO joked that if you placed a pig’s ear next to it, it would look more natural. Another problem was the material. Traditional Ming and Qing circle chairs used high-quality wood, carefully selected for grain and integrity. This set, however, used small, broken pieces of wood, making the seat ring look uneven and unprofessional. Phoebe wood isn’t rare, but the way it was used here was questionable. If anything, the poor material choice further lowered the value. The craftsmanship was also lacking. Unlike traditional methods, which rely on precise joinery and minimal glue, this set showed clear signs of improper assembly. Glue marks were visible, and some joints were even overflowing with adhesive. The core panels were inlaid roughly, and the gaps were filled with obvious glue traces. Even the small coffee table had a major flaw: the connection between the leg and the tooth was cracked and poorly made, resembling a gaping mouth. In terms of technique, modern mahogany furniture often uses silicone or chemical glue, but there’s always a proper process involved. This set, however, seemed to have been glued together without care, leading to structural weaknesses and cracks. In conclusion, the three-piece set of Nanmu circle chairs can be considered a low-quality product. It served as a wake-up call for us. From now on, when purchasing such items, we need to pay close attention to the craftsmanship, train our eyes, and gain enough experience to avoid being deceived. It’s also important to ensure that such substandard products don’t end up on the market.

Skin Essence

Skin Essence,Firming Repair Essence,Brightening Anti-Aging Serum,Anti Aging Vitaoil Serum

RYEOGLOBAL Co,.LTD , https://www.ryeolab.com